|
Cable Brochure-TV services
CABLE SURVEY SUMMARY
Cable Survey Presentation
City of Birmingham
Village of Beverly Hills
Village of Bingham Farms
Village of Franklin
Bloomfield Community Television: http://www.bloomfieldtwp.org/Services/cable/OverviewCable.htm
Comcast
Alliance for Community Media
FCC: http://www.fcc.gov/mb/facts/pegfacts.html
FCC: http://www.fcc.gov/realaudio/agendameetings.html
________Action Alert Letters_________
Senator Shirley Johnson (District 13)
S-324 Capitol Bldg. (Office Address)
PO Box 30036 (Mailing Address)
Lansing, MI 48909-7536
Phone (517) 373-2523
Fax (517) 373-5669
sensjohnson@senate.michigan.gov
Rep. Shelley Goodman Taub (District 40)
Michigan House of Representatives
The Honorable Shelley Goodman Taub
P.O. Box 30014
Lansing, MI 48909-7514phone: 1-866-654-TAUBphone: (517) 373-8670 shelleytaub@house.mi.gov
Senator Carl Levin
269 Russell Office Building
U.S. Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510-2202
P: 202-224-6221
F: 202-224-1388
Email: senator@levin.senate.gov
Senator Debbie Stabenow
133 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
P: 202-224-4822
F: 202-228-0325
Email: senator@stabenow.senate.gov
Congressman Joe Knollenberg
2349 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515-2211
P: 202-225-5802
F: 202-226-2356
To email Rep. Knollenberg, go to:
http://www.house.gov/knollenberg/
and then go to the media center. Follow the site’s instructions. To send our letter, simply cut and paste the letter into the appropriate comments box.
Senator Gilda Jacobs (District 14)
1015 Farnum Bldg. (Office Address)
P.O. Box 30036 (Mailing Address)
Lansing, MI 48909-7536
P: 517-373-7888|
Toll Free: 1-888-937-4453
Fax: 517-373-2983
Email: SenGJacobs@senate.michigan.gov
__________________________________________
SWOCC STUDIOS LEGISLATIVE ACTION LETTER
INSTRUCTIONS:(copy/paste) (email/fax)
http://www.swoccstudios.com/PDF%20Articles/cover%20memo%201-06.pdf
[Insert Date]
[Insert Your Elected Officials Address Information]
RE: CABLE FRANCHISE LEGISLATION
Dear (Your Elected Official),
I write to request your leadership in opposing any legislation that undermines local
government’s ability to protect our residents and to ensure fair competition in cable.
We want fair competition and for like services to be treated alike.
Telephone companies should not be allowed to enter the cable market without
comparable obligations to those of the incumbent cable providers. These obligations
have resulted in public programming which has been a benefit to all.
Preserve Local Authority and Leave No Constituent Behind.
Local rights-of-way management authority is needed to ensure public safety and
efficient use of the rights-of-way. Local oversight in cable has resulted in ALL
citizens, regardless of economic status, being served. Telephone companies are
promoting statutory changes that would allow them to cherrypick rich consumers
while redlining other neighborhoods. Absent local oversight, a Texas or New York
based company would determine who is important and who isn’t. This could result in sucheconomic uncertainty in the cable industry that some residents might wind up
without any provider at all, let alone competition.
The current system works and it works well. Here’s why:
§ Cable franchises provide for public, educational and governmental access
TV, which provides important information to residents including school news,
public safety information, participation in city council meetings and MGTV
(Michigan Government TV).
§ Cable franchises support public infrastructure.
§ Cable franchises provide cities and townships with just compensation for use
of public rights-of-way. Michigan alone could lose $100 million in direct revenue
to local governments. The revenues are spent on right-of-ways, local public access
channels, public education, and public safety. With local governments struggling to make
ends meet, any revenue cut would be painful.
§ Cable franchises enable customers to quickly and completely resolve service issues at
the local level, instead of seeking relief from new Federal or Statewide agencies.
§ Local government is not an impediment to new cable entrants. Cities and townships
promptly grant additional franchises. Existing franchise agreements can be very quickly
amended to simply add any qualified newcomer. The fact is, however, the Telcos have
not bothered to ask.
I urge you to oppose legislation that takes away any local government cable
franchising, franchise fees and local authority.
Sincerely,
|